# Upptime vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 17 185 ✓ | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +101 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-zammad