# Upptime vs Yarrtube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | Yarrtube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #84 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 ✓ | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 45/100 for Yarrtube, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Yarrtube needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [Yarrtube](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-yarrtube