# Upptime vs Xibo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | Xibo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 ✓ | 741 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +6 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 57/100 for Xibo, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Xibo needs more configuration.

Xibo is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [Xibo](https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-xibo