Upptimevswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Upptime details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with