# Upptime vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 17 183 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-woodpecker-ci