# Upptime vs wiki-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | wiki-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #27 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 ✓ | 157 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Markdown | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for wiki-server, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; wiki-server needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [wiki-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/wiki-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wiki-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-wiki-server