# Upptime vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 ✓ | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +46 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-whisperlive-cpu