UpptimevsWhishper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Whishper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 3 091 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Svelte |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 61/100 for Whishper, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Whishper needs more configuration.
Whishper is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →Whishper details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Whishper, compare it with