UpptimevsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 17 185 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →Whirl details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Whirl, compare it with