UpptimevsWhatomate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Whatomate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #37 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 17 185 | 1 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 53/100 for Whatomate, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Whatomate needs more configuration.
Upptime details →Whatomate details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Whatomate, compare it with