UpptimevsWebSSH
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | WebSSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 6 in SSH |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 224 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v2.6.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 50/100 for WebSSH, so it is the safer default.
WebSSH ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; WebSSH needs more configuration.
Upptime details →WebSSH details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep WebSSH, compare it with