UpptimevsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | C |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
Wakupator ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
Upptime details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with