UpptimevsWA-AKG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | WA-AKG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #30 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v1.7.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 56/100 for WA-AKG, so it is the safer default.
WA-AKG ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; WA-AKG needs more configuration.
WA-AKG is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →WA-AKG details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep WA-AKG, compare it with