# Upptime vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 17 183 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +21 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

UrBackup ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; UrBackup needs more configuration.

UrBackup is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-urbackup