# unsloth vs Whirl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | unsloth | Whirl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Local AI | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 78 729 ✓ | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 005 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.

unsloth ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.

If you want the quickest setup, unsloth is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 005 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)
- [Whirl](https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unsloth-vs-whirl