# unsloth vs Wastebin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | unsloth | Wastebin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Local AI | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 78 720 ✓ | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 996 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.

Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+1 996 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)
- [Wastebin](https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unsloth-vs-wastebin