# unsloth vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | unsloth | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Local AI | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 78 697 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 040 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 040 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unsloth-vs-url-to-png