unpubvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unpub | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Package Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 483 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Dart | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 49/100 for unpub, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for unpub.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; unpub needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
unpub details →Workout.cool details →