# Unison vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Unison | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in File Sync | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 560 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | OCaml | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Unison scores 65/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Unison.

If you want the quickest setup, Unison is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Unison is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Unison](https://selfhost.directory/project/unison) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unison.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unison-vs-wraft