# Unison vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Unison | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in File Sync | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 5 559 | 8 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | OCaml | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 65/100 for Unison, so it is the safer default.

Unison ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Unison needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Unison](https://selfhost.directory/project/unison) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unison.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unison-vs-workout-cool