# uncompressed vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uncompressed | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #71 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 53 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +325 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uncompressed-vs-windowsindocker