uncompressedvsWhisper-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uncompressed | Whisper-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #71 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 2 899 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Whisper-WebUI scores 62/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.
uncompressed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whisper-WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Whisper-WebUI is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.
Whisper-WebUI is growing faster right now (+15 stars in 30 days).
uncompressed details →Whisper-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep uncompressed, compare it with
Keep Whisper-WebUI, compare it with