# uncompressed vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uncompressed | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #71 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 3 622 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uncompressed-vs-urbit