uncompressedvsunsloth
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uncompressed | unsloth | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #71 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 78 697 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 040 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
unsloth scores 85/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.
unsloth ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.
If you want the quickest setup, unsloth is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.
unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 040 stars in 30 days).
uncompressed details →unsloth details →
Swap a project
Keep uncompressed, compare it with
Keep unsloth, compare it with