# unbagrnd vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | unbagrnd | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 8 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unbagrnd-vs-workout-cool