# unbagrnd vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | unbagrnd | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 17 956 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +57 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

verdaccio scores 76/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unbagrnd-vs-verdaccio