# unbagrnd vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | unbagrnd | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 179 | 78 735 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 011 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 011 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/unbagrnd-vs-unsloth