Umbraco CMSvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 0 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with