# Umbraco CMS vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Umbraco CMS | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/umbraco-cms-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s