# Umbraco CMS vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Umbraco CMS | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 5 277 | 16 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for Umbraco CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/umbraco-cms-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap