# Umbraco CMS vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Umbraco CMS | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.

If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/umbraco-cms-vs-wyoming-piper