Umbraco CMSvsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 4 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), compare it with