Umbraco CMSvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 3 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with