Umbraco CMSvswebarchive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | webarchive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #11 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 200 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 0 |
| Latest release | release-18.3.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 40/100 for webarchive, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for webarchive.
If you want the quickest setup, webarchive is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →webarchive details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep webarchive, compare it with