Umbraco CMSvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 11 |
| Latest release | release-18.3.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with