Umbraco CMSvswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 277 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 10 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for wanderer.
If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
wanderer is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with