# Umbraco CMS vs 墨台 · VibeHolding

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Umbraco CMS | 墨台 · VibeHolding |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 ✓ | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.

If you want the quickest setup, 墨台 · VibeHolding is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)
- [墨台 · VibeHolding](https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/umbraco-cms-vs-vibe-holding