Umbraco CMSvs墨台 · VibeHolding
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | 墨台 · VibeHolding | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 0 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.
If you want the quickest setup, 墨台 · VibeHolding is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →墨台 · VibeHolding details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep 墨台 · VibeHolding, compare it with