Umbraco CMSvsvanilla-cookbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | vanilla-cookbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #13 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 13 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.6.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 46/100 for vanilla-cookbook, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for vanilla-cookbook.
If you want the quickest setup, vanilla-cookbook is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →vanilla-cookbook details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep vanilla-cookbook, compare it with