# Umbraco CMS vs UmlautAdaptarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Umbraco CMS | UmlautAdaptarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 ✓ | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | release-18.3.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for UmlautAdaptarr.

If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)
- [UmlautAdaptarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/umbraco-cms-vs-umlautadaptarr