# uMap vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uMap | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 628 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

uMap scores 64/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

uMap is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/umap-vs-windows-arm