uMapvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uMap | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 628 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.
uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; uMap needs more configuration.
uMap is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
uMap details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep uMap, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with