Ultimate Certificate ManagervsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ultimate Certificate Manager | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Certificate Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 170 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.246 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 50/100 for Ultimate Certificate Manager, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Ultimate Certificate Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Ultimate Certificate Manager is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Ultimate Certificate Manager details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Ultimate Certificate Manager, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with