UglyFeedvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UglyFeed | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 323 | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
UglyFeed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, UglyFeed is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).
UglyFeed details →Zabbix details →