# UglyFeed vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UglyFeed | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 323 | 8 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uglyfeed-vs-workout-cool