UglyFeedvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UglyFeed | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 323 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
UglyFeed details →Workout.cool details →