# UglyFeed vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UglyFeed | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 323 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uglyfeed-vs-wbo