UglyFeedvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UglyFeed | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 323 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
UglyFeed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
UglyFeed details →Upptime details →