# Typst vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typst | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Publishing | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 56 871 ✓ | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +142 | +160 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typst-vs-woodpecker-ci