# Typst vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Typst | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Publishing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 56 867 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/typst-vs-windows-arm